TED-Ed（おすすめch紹介）

A brie(f) history of cheese – Paul Kindstedt

(c) TED-Ed　Check out our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/teded View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/a-brie-f-history-of-cheese-paul-s-kindstedt Before …

ok but this art style is literally so cute-

I always end up coming back to this specific ted ed video and I think it’s because that not only is the animation adorable, but there’s something so comforting about learning about our ancestors making food that we still love today. Cheese is just so universal and has been for ages, it makes me feel bonded to millions of people in the world I haven’t even met <3

Animators: How cute should we make the cheese?Ted Ed: Yes.

I must crave historical cheese…

I love how the people are mostly drawn seriously and then there are just smiling cheeses.

I love how 99.9% of human cuisine history is “I’m gonna eat this thing and see if it kills me”. The other .1% of it is “Even if it does kill me, we’ll find a way to make it edible”.

Clergymen in monasteries should be praying like: “Oh Cheeses!”

“A brie(f) history of cheese”Ted-Ed I love you XD

how did man find out that milk was edible from other animals? did it happen like this? “yo, dude. i was under this cow, man and white stuff came out of it’s crotch, it tastes amazing.” “wait, how did your face under an animals crotch and how did you find out that the white stuff tastes good?” “……. don’t ask questions you don’t want answered”

Cheese gameplay: Cheese goes well with burgers yummyCheese Lore:

The animation is so adorable and well made! I want to know who animated it so I can check their other stuff, but the description doesn’t say

As a Mongolian, that BOOASLAG was hilarious, it’s actually bYAslag, “YA” sound like yak & yard xD

This is basicly when a secondary character gets a lot of attention in a series

the art style made me smile throughout the whole video, it’s just too cute.

It’s fascinating to think that many food that we enjoy today have served as one of the most important building blocks to develop civilizations.

I always eat cheese while watching this it’s like a personal tradition now

This video is so comforting for some reason, I’ve watched this video countless times.

Mad respect for the brave farmers who ate spoiled milk and discovered one of the best foods in existence

I’ve never seen cheese look so happy.

I wish you would’ve mentioned the Pictish Crowdie Cheese. My Grandmother used to tell me stories about how, when she was growing up, her family had a milking cow that kept them alive through the Great Depression in the US, she even told me about her Irish Mother’s homemade cheese recipe, sour milk hung from a stocking overnight. When I recently discovered a XIX C. recipe for Scottish Crowdie Cheese, I realized that it was the same recipe that my Irish Great Grandmother used to make. And now I’ve revived the tradition and make my own cheese.

Why do cats act so weird? – Tony Buffington

(c) TED-Ed　Check out our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/teded View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/why-do-cats-act-so-weird-tony-buffington They’re cute, …

Explore more fascinating facts from the animal kingdom with this playlist: http://bit.ly/2I7F48x

Someone told me a story of a guy who broke his leg badly and had to rest on his bed for days and his cat started to sleep specifically on his hurt leg and purr like all day long. When he recovered, his doctor told him that it was surprisingly fast. The guy was intrigued and after some research discovered that the cat’s purring frequency is, as the video said, perfect for tissue regeneration. His cat *knew* that and dedicated his time in healing his human. I find that pretty cool.

I can assure you that my cat would not have survived in the wild.

I work at a cat cafe and I can confirm all cats have different personalities and they’re all fun in their own ways. Even thought they’re little shits I love them.

Dogs believe we quit our jobs to spend more time with them this quarantine, cats believe we lost our jobs like the losers they always knew we were

The “cat purrs can heal tissue” is real. Thats why some cats will come sleep near or on you while you are sad or in pain – they’re trying to “fix” you.

My cat Marian recently began alerting me to my anxiety and panic attacks before they happen. She’s my Emotional Support Animal, and I’ve barely had her for a year (she’s about 21 months old), but I never could have imagined that she would teach herself to “task” like a service dog is taught to do. When she senses it, she herds me toward my bed, and lays on my chest and purrs once I lie down. I then start having very recognizable symptoms, and eventually have the attack. Once it’s over, she hops off my chest and walks away like it never happened. She’s done it at least three times within the past six months. It’s really amazing how she’s so insistent about it, too. She knows what I need before I do, and is really good at taking care of me during my episodes. She’ll lick my forehead sometimes, too, and always curls up next to me in bed at night. I really love that cat 🐈

Remember … dogs have owners, cats have staff.

There was actually a study that found cats do actually love us. The study found cats won’t explore an unfamiliar environment without their “parent” within eyesight. It’s often interpreted as a cat needing the security of knowing their “parent” is nearby to comfort and protect them.

I have endometriosis. My cat comes sit on my tummy and purrs whenever I feel discomfort from my illness. And it’s the only time he would do that. But unfortunately my condition is severe so I dont notice any relief whenever he does that. But I understand it’s something. Wallahualam.

My grandma have a heart condition, and each time she feels bad and lying on her sofa, her cat comes to her and lies down on her chest and starts to purr. Grandma says that each time she feels somehow better.

I had 2 barn cats. Every morning I’d go to clean the horse stalls they’d have a dead mouse to show me. Almost as if they wanted me to be proud of them or something. I ended up moving to a house with no barn and took both the cats with me. Their transition going from murderous barn cats to being domesticated was fast, and they both turned into the best cats I’ve ever met.

“Dogs scare me”Dog person: “NOOO DOGS ARE ADORABLE!””Cats scare me”Cat person: “First time?”

Cats don’t scratch furniture to “sharpen their claws”. They have scent glands between their toes, so they actually scratch to mark their territory & communicate with other animals. Territorial boundaries & owning items makes them feel secure. Other than that, great & accurate info in this video!

If you spend time bonding with your cat its amazing how much love they can give. They are different from dogs on that part because if you give a dog seconds of affection they will stick with you the whole day. Cats require time.

As a wise man once said, “Dogs are loyal obedient friends, cats are just tiny tigers that live in your house.”

I like that some people are just watching this for fun meanwhile I have to watch this for school

i love how intriguing cats can be, despite being lazy couch potatoes at times, they are so complex and interesting

HAHA love this!

Now explain why sleeping on the remote is a great evolutionary tactic

Can you solve the wizard standoff riddle? – Dan Finkel

(c) TED-Ed　Practice more problem-solving at https://brilliant.org/TedEd/ Sign up to be emailed the solution to the bonus riddle: https://brilliant.org/tededpoisonapples/ You’ve …

Sign up to be emailed the solution to the bonus riddle: https://brilliant.org/tededpoisonapples/! Also, the first 833 of you who sign up for a PREMIUM subscription will get 20% off the annual fee. Riddle on, riddlers!

I would pick the Noether 5000 because I could just banish myself to the top of a mountain and survive the duel.

Well, it has been pointed out a million times, but once more: You did not say that missing on purpose was an option.

Disappointed that the answer involves “missing on purpose” when that wasn’t offered as a solution. Stabbing the other wizards with a wand would also work, even though it wasn’t listed as an option.

Rules say that you only have to be left standing. If you get turned into a statue, are you not standing forever, outliving the surviving wizard and thus winning the contest?

After your masterful strategy to ‘miss 1st’, the Newt-Niz sorcerer (also with mastery of strategy) also misses on purpose to maximize his chance of success. The Lieb-Ton enchantress (also with mastery of strategy) recognizes and accepts her position in this prisoner’s trilemma, and condemns everyone to the Nash Equilibrium by also intentionally missing her shot.

Since you can make up new rules, here are a few fun solutions to win the duel.Since the rules state the duel ends when only one is standing, you can sit down to temporarily eliminate yourself. The rules do not state you cannot return to the duel after being eliminated.Option 1: I cast Fireball, targeting the ground near the two of them, eliminating both without targeting either. Neither of them are allowed to cast counterspell since that would be casting out of turn. There is no rule against it, therefore is an option.Option 2: I use the 100% wand to eliminate one of my enemies, and then sit down. I am no longer standing meaning the third person cannot target me. I stand up during my turn at round 2 (see rule 5 stating “end of first round” not start of second) and eliminate the third person. There is no rule against it, therefore is an option.Option 3: I teleport to the mountain on my turn, sit down and then run back for my next and end the third person. The rules state you do not eliminate yourself by casting the wand on yourself, only an opponent. There is no rule against it, therefore is an option.Option 4: Shoot one of the competitors before the duel starts. There is no rule against it, therefore is an option.Option 5: Break both of their knees with the baseball bat 9000 wand. Neither of them are standing, meaning you win.But seriously, missing being allowed should be stated within the rules of a LOGIC puzzle. Rules as written, missing isn’t allowed since you are not casting a spell at an opponent to eliminate them.

I pull out a glock and perform the most powerful spell of all.

Okay let me just say, never is it said that you can miss on purpose. The answer lies outside of the defined scope of the riddle.

See, a vital part of the riddle was left out where you can miss on purpose. As well as your opponents being able to know which wand you took (As if an accomplished wizard wouldn’t just make their wand look like something else.) It takes away from having two hands, two wands. If they were staffs, I’d let that go. But those are clearly no-incantation sparkle-flingers, where you can have one in each hand. The biggest problem is that you could just teleport around the world with the Noether 9000 until you got close enough to wherever you wanted to be. No chances. only true survival. In a duel to the death, surviving is victory.

Call me pedantic, but I read “take turns casting spells to eliminate each other” as a stipulation to always aim at a contestant. With that in mind, I would have taken the 60% wand, aimed at the enchantress and hoped for a misfire.

Or pick the Noether 9000 & banish the sorcerer.If the enchantress DOES take the next turn, they’ll be casting out of order…which is against the first rule.Therefore, they’d be forfeiting the match.There’s a 90% chance you’ll be turned into stone, but a 100% chance you’ll still win the duel by default.Winning was the point, yes? 1:48

This is the most ridiculous “riddle” I’ve ever seen. You can’t just make up new rules. In which case, my answer is I sneak a live lion into the arena which I have been training for 4 years prior.

“There’s still a 3% chance that you’ll all be turned into cats.”I’m okay with that.

Without mentioning that a vital component of the solution, missing, was an allowable option, this is not a matter of problem-solving but a childish game of not telling all the rules. In fact, rule 1 explicitly implies this intentional missing strategy is not permitted because it defines the objective as “take turns casting spells to eliminate each other from the duel.” Missing is not only a cheap answer for being an unknown option, but also because you can make a completely legitimate claim that missing on purpose is failing to “casting spells to eliminate each other from the duel.”

Missing on purpose violates the first rule, because it’s a spell cast explicitly without the intention of eliminating another person from the duel.

By the logic of the video, i.e “They never said I couldn’t do that”, I take the weakest wand for the first round, hide the strongest wand in my pocket, and when the 90% wizard kills the other guy I take out the strongest wand and zap her. Simple, see?

“To prevent draws, a draw is declared if no hits are scored in the first round”

The rules state the winner is the last wizard “standing.” Therefore , standing on a cold mountain after casting the 100% spell on yourself is the most forcing move given the rules of the game.

Got to love riddles where magically a third option (skipping the turn or missing on purpose) appears after the rules have been delivered…

Can you solve the locker riddle? – Lisa Winer

(c) TED-Ed　View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-solve-the-locker-riddle-lisa-winer Your rich, eccentric uncle just passed away, and you and your 99 nasty …

Easy, tell them: “Atleast one of you has green eyes.” and wait 100 days.

I thought the whole point in the uncle Developing the riddle is to prevent family members from badgering you. Now not only will they badger you, they’ll hate you for being smarter than them

Homework: what’s 2+2?Exam: this video

Title: Can you solve….Me: Probably not. But I’ll watch the 3 minute video anyway.

Both the uncle and the lawyer have the best mustaches in the universe

1: confirm you have green eyes.2: Sneak all the money into your pockets3: Ask your relatives for permission to leave forever4: Profit

*Teded: But how?-*Me: Idk, I’m definitely not as smart as this 9 years old girl

0:31 I think my uncle overestimated my intelligence

After completion of the video, I took a deep breath and started to realize how poor my math skills are.

If this was me, my uncle would have face palm in the heaven.

Title: can you solve the locker riddle?Me: *no*Also me: *watches it anyways*

My question is, if they’re my family, WHY AM I THE ONLY ORANGE ONE, my momma got some explain for to do

“And then exactly one month later, you are assassinated in your sleep.”

“Pause the video now if you want to figure it out for yourself”Me: figure out what exactly?

Instant replay: you step forward and tell the lawyer you know witch lockers will remain open. But How? Answer: Your uncle told you.Edit: wow. i logged on to my old account hoping to find something nice from 2 years ago and found this comment i made for fun with 460 likes. that the most ive ever gotten. WOW

This isn’t a riddle, this is my math homework.

Step 1: Confirm you have green eyesStep 2: Ask the 99 relatives to leave

At the end, you’d still take all the inheritance, and they’ll still pester you

Wait- he _voice acts the lawyer??_This narrator just gets better and better

This made me realise that my maths and my IQ both sucks.🤔😲

Can you solve the virus riddle? – Lisa Winer

(c) TED-Ed　View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-solve-the-virus-riddle-lisa-winer Your research team has found a prehistoric virus preserved in the permafrost …

When you fail to solve the riddle and 2 years later the virus escapes

Me at first: SACRIFICES MUST BE MADE!!!! Me after solution: Oh yeah, well, that works too.

“Congratulations. You’ve prevented an epidemic of apocalyptic proportions” Aged like fine wine

Step one: confirm you have green eyesStep two: ask the virus if you can leave

Legit the first time I was actually able to solve a TED-Ed riddle. Little win for me today…Edit: Geez, thanks for all the likes my dudes

this seems like an incredibly ineffective plan and building layout

my brain at 3am:”let’s solve another puzzle”my braing when i actually need it:”2+2=4, it seem okay, but let us use a calculator, JuSt To Be SuRe”

Such a nice feeling when you were finally able to solve one of these puzzles by yourself

The ending here has a new meaning. Since the “safe ” room by the entrance was clean, it became contaminated when you entered and then returned. The last room was also contaminated, the door leading to the exit.Since you escaped…. you let some of the virus out when you left. The virus is out…. and it’s in the world… and you, Mr. Traveling Salesman, are carrying it wherever you go.You should have just just flipped the switch and let yourself be buried in concrete. Now the virus won’t get out, because your contaminated. Your suit is, and you can’t get out of it. It’s a one way trip in realistic terms.

Ted-ED then: “ Congratulations, You’ve prevented an epidemic of apocalyptic proportions”Ted-ED now: I should not have said that, I should not have said that.

them giving this really hard puzzle:*me wondering if the things on the man are cheeks or ears*

Really cool. I feel this is a case where the protagonists need to calm down, pay attention to the rules, and the solutions should become clear.

Ok, but who makes more of the sample and puts it in separate rooms-

That time where Ted-Ed predicted the future.

This is actually the first time I was able to solve TED-Ed’s riddles without him even finishing his explanation ;-;

Hey, I just realized. By this very same logic, you can actually Start and End in the Same Room. Why? Well, first of all, remember the solution. You can go back to the first room immediately after destroying the second room you enter. That also means that you can go through the entire facility and return to the very room you Started in as the last place you go.Mind you, the logic puzzle REQUIRES you (for some reason) to end on the opposite corner, but still.

This is nostalgic, I was first in my class solving this 4 years ago 😂

I have been watching these riddles for 2 days now. My strategy was to think out of the box and I was thinking of going around the whole building and entering using the exit door and finishing with the entrance. I traced my path and it actually works. Lol

All these covid jokes and I’m over here appreciating the travelling salesman joke a the end.

I initially thought of heading directly out the entry for the exit and going around the grid like that. I think it works lol. That’s what I get for doing a bunch of these riddles and thinking “too laterally”